Tuesday 27 December 2016

MY TOP 10 FILMS OF 2016


2016 has been a great year in terms of films. Looking back, there were a lot of highly anticipated films released this year and, fortunately, only a small number of them were disappointing. In my annual end-of-year Top 10, I'll be discussing my favourite films that were released this year. This list is in no particular order. 

Honourable Mentions:
These are the films that didn't make the list but still deserve a mention and are definitely worth a watch.

This was one of the first comedies released this year and, while it's not the funniest, it's still really entertaining and is worth a watch if you enjoy comedy. The main reason I enjoyed this is because it focused on women and how they can have fun without having a boyfriend. I've seen far too many comedies try and force in a romance between the two main protagonists even though it's not necessary. The main character is Alice (Dakota Johnson) who has, recently, ended her relationship with her boyfriend and moves to New York to live with her sister (Leslie Mann). This is where she meets and befriends Robin (Rebel Wilson) who teaches Alice how to enjoy being single. Wilson is definitely one of the best things about this film as she doesn't hold back from hilarious one liners. Johnson proves that she can be just as funny and Mann is perfect as her sister who becomes broody after working as a midwife. 

This is one of the most original films I've watched this year and the film's story focuses on an app called 'Nerve' where the person chooses to be either a player or watcher. If the person chooses to watch, they pay a fee and choose the dares for the players. If the players successfully complete the dare, they earn money. The two main characters are Vee (Emma Roberts) and Ian (Dave Franco) who get caught up in the game and are risking their lives when the dares become more dangerous. Both Roberts and Franco have great chemistry together which is important because the film's main focus is on them. At first, the two think that the dares are a lot of fun but things take a dark and serious turn and it's up to the pair to stop the game for good before any serious damage is caused. This really kept me on the edge of my seat especially during some of the dares. I had no idea if anyone was going to make it out alive. This was released during the Pokemon Go hype and it makes you realise how caught up and obsesssed we are with the latest technology. I highly recommend this if you're a fan of thrillers.

To be honest, when this was first released, I had no desire to see this as, judging from the trailer, I thought it'd be cheesy. However, I was surprised at how much I enjoyed it. Emilia Clarke is perfect as the optimistic Lou Clark who begins working for Sam Claflin's character, Will Traynor, who, after an unfortunate road accident, is paralysed. Will is the complete opposite of Lou and is understandably depressed but Lou is determined to make his life better and it doesn't take long for the two to become close friends. Me Before You mainly benefits from Clarke and Claflin's alluring chemistry. Despite Lou already having a boyfriend, Patrick (Matthew Lewis), I really wanted her to be with Will. The film clearly shows us that Lou's relationship with Patrick isn't that great and we see her becoming closer with Will. The film also does a great job of handling a subject that I've never seen in film before and that's the life of a paralysed person. When we first meet Will, he has no desire to live but Lou, with her optimism, gives him a reason to remain strong. It is definitely one of the most emotional films I've watched this year and if you're thinking of watching it, be sure to keep some tissues near as you'll most likely be crying during the film's climax.

It's been a busy year for Disney. Not only have they released two animated features, Zootopia and Moana, they've also released two live action adaptations of classic films including Pete's Dragon which is a remake of the 1977 musical and The Jungle Book which is a remake of the 1967 animated feature. Although Pete's Dragon was an enjoyable adaptation and was a lot better than the original, I would have to say I think that The Jungle Book is better. I loved the original animation so I had high hopes for this live action remake. Fortunately, it didn't disappoint and, in some ways, improved on the original. This includes the visuals. The young actor who portrays Mowgli, Neel Sethi, is the only one who appears in the flesh. All the other characters are created using computer generated imagery and look incredibly life like. The jungle is an important part as it's where the majority of the film is set and it's brought to life. Sethi's performance is really impressive and captures the charm of Mowgli. It also has an great cast of voices including; Bill Murray as Baloo the bear; Ben Kingsley as Bagheera the panther; Idris Elba as Shere Khan the tiger; Lupita Nyong'o as Raksha the wolf; Scarlett Johansson as Kaa the snake and many more. They all bring their own distinct voices to their chosen role and make The Jungle Book an even more entertaining watch. This film is definitely worth a watch for many reasons one of them being the stunning visuals and impressive debut performance from Neel Sethi.

After the release of Finding Nemo in 2003, it soon went on to become one of the best selling films of that year. Usually, because of its success at the box office, most production companies would start writing a sequel straightaway and have it released within 2-3 years. However, Disney/Pixar took its time creating a sequel for Finding Nemo and focused on creating more original animated films. Now, after a thirteen year wait, the sequel fans have been waiting for is finally here and it didn't disappoint. The first film focused on Marlin (voice of Albert Brooks), a clownfish, searching for his son, Nemo (Alexander Gould) along with the help of a blue tang with short-term memory loss, Dory (Ellen DeGeneres). Now, this film focuses on Dory as she travels through an aquarium with the help of an octopus, Hank (Ed O'Neill), in order to find her parents. At first, when I heard the title, I thought that it might be about Dory going missing and Marlin and Nemo going out to look for her. This film is actually more about finding more about Dory and her life before she met Marlin. This film brings more depth to her character and, thanks to DeGeneres' voice, makes her a more likable protagonist. I wasn't wrong about Marlin and Nemo, though. When Dory accidentally ends up in the aquarium, it's up to Marlin and Nemo to go out and look for her. There scenes includes some bonding between the father and son. This is a rare sequel that proves to be just as entertaining as its predecessor and is definitely worth a watch if you enjoyed Finding Nemo.

When it was announced that there was going to be third film in the much loved Bridget Jones franchise, I couldn't have been more excited. I was a bit surprised, though, considering that the actress who portrayed the title character, Renee Zellweger, had taken a hiatus from acting in 2010. Fortunately, Zellweger returned to one of her best roles and filming began in late 2015. Now, after 12 years of the release of the first sequel Bridget Jones: The Edge Of Reason, Bridget is back and, this time, she's pregnant but the only problem is she doesn't know who the father is. Is it her ex, Mark Darcy (Colin Firth) or a charming new love interest, Jack Quant (Patrick Dempsey)? I did have certain doubts before I watched this film as I know The Edge Of Reason failed to impress critics and audiences when it was released. However, the majority of the reactions to this film were positive and I can't understand why I had any doubts in the first place. Despite being linked to the earlier Bridget Jones films, I'd say that this is good enough on its own. Viewers who haven't seen the two predecessors need not worry as this is simply a comedy about a woman finding out who the father of her unborn child is. This plotline has been used several times in many films and episodes of TV shows, however, Bridget Jones's Baby brings original comedy and makes it fresh. Bridget Jones's Baby is definitely worth a watch if you're looking for a comedy that is highly entertaining.

I will never understand the negative reception that this remake of the 1984 comedy, Ghostbusters, received. I remember when the trailer was released and the comments were filled with hateful comments and this was all because all four of the title characters were played by women rather than men. Being a woman, I loved the idea of an all-female remake of Ghostbusters and it was one of my highly anticipated films of this year. However, I was surprised when, on its release day in the UK, the IMDb page became filled with negative ratings leading it to receive an overall rating of 3.7/10. Despite this, critics were more positive towards the new remake and it received a 73% Fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Because of the negative response, I went in with low expectations, fortunately, this film exceeded my expectations. As much as I enjoyed the 1984 Ghostbusters, I have to say I enjoyed this a lot more and that's not because it's an all-female remake and I'm a woman, it's because I felt like it was more entertaining. All four of the leads, Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones, have great chemistry together. This isn't the first time Wiig and McCarthy have worked together: they both starred alongside each other in Bridesmaids. Because of this, the two have natural chemistry together. However, this is the first feature film for McKinnon and Jones, who are best known for appearing in several sketches on Saturday Night Live, and, together, they bring most of the laughs with their many one-liners and character traits. Chris Hemsworth, who is best known for portraying Thor in the Marvel films, is a surprise here and brings humour to his role as Kevin, the receptionist who really isn't at all bright. There are even cameos from members of the original Ghostbusters cast including Bill Murray, Ernie Hudson, Annie Potts, Dan Aykroyd and Sigourney Weaver. Overall, this all-female reboot does an impressive job of standing on its own as a marvelously cast supernatural comedy. I wouldn't recommend paying attention to the negativity surrounding this film as, after all, it's just a comedy created to entertain fans of the original.

10. Nocturnal Animals
This is Amy Adam's third film this year (the other two being Batman V Superman and Arrival) and also one of her best performances. She plays Susan Morrow, an art gallery owner, who is currently in an unhappy relationship with her husband, Hutton (Armie Hammer). However, things take a drastic turn when she receives a manuscript of a novel from her ex-husband, Edward (Jake Gyllenhaal), called Nocturnal Animals. What makes this unusual is that she hasn't heard from Edward in 19 years and the book is based on their life. The film frequently cuts between parts of the book, Susan's reaction and her relationship with Edward. Throughout the film, I wondered what Susan had done that was unforgivable? Because the book is dark and, at times, violent, I wonder if any of those things had actually happened during their relationship? Nocturnal Animals asks a lot of questions and only a few of them are answered. However, this doesn't make this a bad film, it is actually one of the most original films this year. I hadn't seen Tom Ford's 2009 directorial debut, A Single Man, prior to watching this so I had no idea what to expect. Ford definitely doesn't shy away from anything here. The opening shows naked obese women dancing, the violence that features in the film is quite graphic and disturbing and there's even a naked man on the toilet. However, while some of this may gross some viewers and may affect their opinion of the film, for me, I just accepted it. If there's a reason to watch the film, I'd say it's the performances that really sell it. Adams gives a solid performance as Susan, her reactions to parts from the book are really convincing as we can clearly see that she is affected by it. Gyllenhaal proves, once again, why he's one of the best actors of our generation and manages the difficult task of playing two different characters including Edward and Tony Hastings in the book. We see more of Tony than we do of Edward, however, both performances are really strong. I would like to see him win an Oscar one day. Both Michael Shannon and Aaron Taylor-Johnson give exceptional performances as two characters in the book.

9. Zootropolis
Okay, I confess to not watching this film when it was first released in March this year as I thought that it was aimed at young viewers. However, I couldn't have been more wrong. It received massive critical acclaim and many audiences enjoyed it as well. Critics said that it was suitable for viewers of all ages because of the themes that feature in this film and I couldn't agree more. Despite living in the 21st Century, people still judge and discriminate against other people based on numerous things including gender, sexuality, race and skin colour. Disney successfully manages to create a story that offers a thoughtful and inclusive message whilst managing to be entertaining and funny enough for younger viewers. Zootropolis consists of anthropomorphic animals who are split into two groups, predators and prey. While predators no longer hunt and feed on prey and live in peaceful harmony with them, there are still issues of prejudice and discrimination. This is made clear where a bunny, Judy Hopps (Ginnifer Goodwin), moves to the titled city hoping to become a police officer. Unfortunately, because she's a bunny and the first one to become a member of the police force, she becomes victim to prejudice. Despite this, Judy doesn't let this get to her. She is smart, tough, witty, brave - everything you could want in a protagonist. The second character is Nick Wilde (Jason Bateman), a sly fox who makes his money by conning people. Judy catches him but, instead of arresting him, asks for his help regarding a missing otter. Nick agrees and this leads to an unlikely friendship developing between the two. Not only does Zootropolis impress with its message, it features an original story. I enjoyed watching Judy and Nick together as the two couldn't be more different, however, it turns out they are more alike than they thought as they were both subject to bullying as children. In the beginning of the film, we see Judy as a child being bullied by a fox which leads to her thinking that all foxes are like that and her parents giving her a spray to protect her. And, in the middle of the film, we see Nick, as a child, wanting to join the Ranger Scouts but is discriminated against because he's a fox. These scenes causes the viewer to feel sympathetic towards them. Overall, this is a film that is worth watching for many reasons, the main one being it's important message which is to never discriminate or judge someone.

When I heard that there was going to be a film adaptation of Paula Hawkin's best selling book, The Girl On The Train, I thought I'd give the book a read and I really enjoyed it. It was thrilling throughout and full of twists. Because of this, I did have high hopes for this film and was surprised to discover that it had received a lot of criticism. This meant my expectations were lowered, however, after watching it, I couldn't understand the negative reception it had received. I thought it was a great adaptation of Hawkin's book and, despite knowing what was going to happen, I was still on the edge of my seat. The Girl On The Train focuses on Rachel (Emily Blunt) who becomes obsessed with watching her ex-husband's house and another house a few doors down which is owned by a couple, Megan (Haley Bennett) and Scott (Luke Evans). However, she soon becomes caught up in a mystery when Megan disappears. This is worth a watch if you enjoy drama/thrillers. This also features a strong performance from Emily Blunt and all the actors involved. 

This was another film that received a lot of criticism when it was first released. I think this is because people's expectations were so high especially after the release of the previous film, Days Of Future Past, which is probably the best in the whole X-Men franchise. Despite the negativity surrounding this film, I really enjoyed it. I thought it was a great sequel to Days Of Future Past and features plenty of action and a strong villain, Apocalypse (Oscar Isaac), who is the strongest mutant. It also introduces us to the younger versions of character we already know from the first X-Men films, however, some characters may have turned out differently due to the events of Days Of Future Past. The film focuses on Apocalypse who has been awakened after thousands of years and is determined to wipe out civilisation and create a new world. This leads to him recruiting mutants including a depressed Magneto (Michael Fassbender), Storm (Alexandra Shipp) and two new mutants, Angel (Ben Hardy) and Psylocke (Olivia Munn). With Professor Charles Xavier (James McAvoy) taken hostage by Apocalypse, it's up to a new team of X-Men, including Mystique (Jennifer Lawrence), Beast (Nicholas Hoult), Quicksilver (Evan Peters), Jean Grey (Sophie Turner), Cyclops (Tye Sheridan) and Nightcrawler (Kodi Smit-McPhee) to try and stop Apocalypse. I would say that this is the second best in the franchise as it's full of thrilling action and features strong performances from the majority of the cast. This includes McAvoy, Fassbender, Lawrence, Hoult and Peters who all return from previous installments. The new cast are also really good, especially Turner as Jean. She's best known for appearing in fantasty drama series, Game Of Thrones, however, this role proves what a talented actress she is and she understands Jean's struggle to control her mind-reading powers. I also thought that Isaac gave a strong performance as Apocalypse, who, because of his many powers, was scary at times as I wasn't sure what he would do next. The climax had me on the edge of my seat as it was really tense. I doubt fans of X-Men will be disappointed with this latest installment.

This was a film that I wasn't expecting to enjoy as much as I did. At first, I wasn't interested in watching 10 Cloverfield Lane as I didn't really like Cloverfield due to it being filmed using a handcam which it was incredibly shaky and was hard to keep up with at times. However, this all changed in the sequel which I think is an improvement on the first film. The camera is stable and, instead of an alien destroying New York, the focus is on three different characters who are all trapped in an underground bunker. This includes Michelle (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), Howard (John Goodman) and Emmett (John Gallagher Jr.). The film's tagline is 'Monsters come in many forms' and that's the main premise. When we first meet Howard, he comes across as creepy and has very strict rules for his bunker and Goodman's portrays him as a monster because of the things he does. Fortunately for Michelle, she becomes friends with Emmett who is friendly and has an optimistic outlook on the situation. Before watching this film, I read the entire synopsis as I didn't think I would ever watch it so I wasn't surprised by certain things that happen. The stand out performance is Winstead as Michelle as she portrays her as a strong and brave individual. The majority of the film is set inside the bunker and gives it a claustrophobic feel as there's no where else to go. It also makes the audience wonder what's going on outside and if Howard is telling the truth about there being an apocalyptic catastrophe. Like the audience, Michelle is unsure what to believe and comes up with a plan to escape. The producer of Cloverfield, J.J. Abrams, has described 10 Cloverfield Lane as a 'blood-relative' to the first film. It's not clearly explained whether it's a prequel or a sequel but, judging from 10 Cloverfield Lane's thrilling climax, I'm guessing that the story took place around the same time as the first film. Overall, this is one of the best thrillers I've watched because it's smart, solidly crafted and palpably tense. 10 Cloverfield Lane makes the most of its confined setting and all three leads give strong performances.

Fans of the Harry Potter franchise were, understandably, upset when the final film, Deathly Hallows Part 2, was released in July 2011. They all thought that this was the end of the Wizarding World but, fortunately, J.K. Rowling admitted to not being able to 'let go' of the magical world she had created in her books. This lead to her writing a West-End play, Harry Potter And The Cursed Child, which is set 19 years after the events of Deathly Hallows Part 2. Not only that but she wrote her first ever screenplay, Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them, which is based on a textbook that Harry Potter reads at Hogwarts. The story is set in 1926 and Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) has just completed a global excursion to find and document an extraordinary array of magical creatures. Arriving in New York for a brief stopover, he might have come and gone without incident...were it not for a No-Maj (American for Muggle) named Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler), a misplaced magical case, and the escape of some of Newt's fantastic beasts, which could spell trouble for both the wizarding and No-Maj worlds. This is one of the most anticipated films this year and, unlike other highly anticipated films, Fantastic Beasts not only met my expectations, it beat them. Making a motion picture that is as enjoyable as the Harry Potter films must have been incredibly stressful but both the cast and crew have succeeded. I can't imagine any Harry Potter fans being disappointed. David Yates, who directed the final four films in the Potter franchise, returns and I couldn't think of anyone else better than Yates at directing. He brings J.K. Rowling's imaginative world to life once again. The setting is completely different to anything we've seen before in the Potter films as it's in New York and is set in the late 1920s. Both the setting and costume design are perfect. It felt like I was transported to New York in 1926. The performances all round are brilliant but the stand out is, of course, Redmayne as shy and awkward Newt. It's hard to believe that almost three years ago he gave an Oscar-winning portrayal as Professor Stephen Hawking in the 2014 drama, The Theory Of Everything. This role is further proof that Redmayne is one of the best actors of this generation. Other strong performances come from Katherine Waterston as the brave ex-Auror (dark wizard catcher), Tina Goldstein, who is willing to help Newt, Dan Fogler, who brings comic relief as Jacob, and Alison Sudol, who is perfectly flirtatious as Tina's sister, Queenie. Recognisable actors include Colin Farrell as Percival Graves who is a high ranking Auror but has a dark side to him. Ezra Miller gives a sympathetic performance as, Credence Barebone who is the mysterious son of the sinister leader of New Salem Philanthropic Society. Credence also plays an important part in the film's exciting climax. There's not a bad performance to be found. Overall, this is a welcome return to the Wizarding World.

4. Moana
Disney have managed to produce over hundreds of entertaining animated features that are suitable for the whole family. Moana, Disney's latest offering, is no different and provides over 100 minutes of solid storytelling, the best animation I've seen this year and two likable lead characters.
Moana Waialiki (voice of Auli'i Cravalho) is a sea voyaging enthusiast and the only daughter of a chief in a long line of navigators. When her island's fisherman can't catch any fish and the crops fail, she learns that the demigod Maui (Dwayne Johnson) caused the blight by stealing the heart of the goddess Te Fiti. The only way to heal the island is to persuade Maui to return Te Fiti's heart, so Moana sets off on an epic journey across the Pacific. The film is based on stories from Polynesian mythology. Moana takes place in Polynesia which is a part of Oceania, a region that consists of numerous islands dispersed throughout the Pacific Ocean. This isn't the first Disney animated film to feature a Polynesian theme. Lilo & Stitch also took place in modern day Hawaii, however, Moana is the production company's first Polynesian princess, growing up in the fictional island of Motunui. She is also a clear example of the lead animated characters becoming more diverse. For a long time, Disney were known for creating princesses whose only concern were marrying a prince. Fortunately, those times have changed and there is no love interest for the lead protagonist. Her relationship with the demigod Maui is purely platonic and he behaves like her older brother most of the time. This was one of my favourite things about this animated feature. Overall, with its title character being as three-dimensional as its beautiful animation, Moana is truly a family-friendly adventure for the ages.

3. Joy 
Jennifer Lawrence is one of my favourite actors working in Hollywood at the moment. Since appearing in The Hunger Games in 2012, she has gone on to receive phenomenal success. She has won one Academy Award for her performance as Tiffany in Silver Linings Playbook, along with three other nominations and she's also won three Golden Globes. Released in January earlier this year, this was her first of three films Lawrence appeared in (the others being X-Men Apocalypse and Passengers). She plays the title character who is based on real life business woman and entrepreneur, Joy Mangano. In her third collaboration with director David O. Russell (the two previously worked together on Silver Linings Playbook and American Hustle), Lawrence portrays Joy as a determined, hard-working mother of two who comes up with a new product, the Miracle Mop, which is self-wringing. Unfortunately, selling this product is easier said than done and, throughout the film, we see Joy overcome many obstacles which makes her a strong protagonist. What I liked most about this film was, apart from Lawrence's brilliant performance, the fact that there's no unnecessary love interest for Joy. In order to get her self-wringing mop noticed, she meets with the executive of QVC, Neil Walker (Bradley Cooper), so she can get it advertised. Most filmmakers would try and force these two characters to fall in love but, fortunately, that's not the case here. Their relationship is purely platonic and nothing happens between them. I also thought that this film was really inspiring as we Joy struggle a lot before she finally becomes the successful entrepreneur she is today.

This was my highly anticipated film this year as it featured Jennifer Lawrence in one of the lead roles. The plot also really intrigued me as well because the story seemed original. The setting is the Starship Avalon which is a spaceship travelling to a new planet known as Homestead II, however, because this journey will take 120 years, all 5,000 passengers are sent to sleep inside their hibernation pods. Unfortunately, 30 years into the journey, the ship hits a meteor which leads to two hibernation pods malfunctioning. The two passengers that wake up are Jim Preston (Chris Pratt) and Aurora Lane (Lawrence). It doesn't take long for them to realise that they're the only two people awake and they still have at least 90 years of their journey to go. Creating a science-fiction film can be a difficult thing to achieve but, nevertheless, director Morten Tyldum brings Jon Spaihts' script to life. Before watching the film, I really enjoyed reading Spaihts' script and knew it would be an entertaining film. Passengers is at its most entertaining during the first 90 minutes in which Jim and Aurora's relationship develops. In a montage, we see the two dance, play basketball and dine together. Unfortunately, things take a drastic turn in the climax when the ship begins to malfunction and it's up to the pair to fix it and save all 5,000 passengers. Both Lawrence and Pratt give strong performances in this film and share a lot of chemistry. Passengers further proves how talented Lawrence is, given that this is the third film she's appeared in this year (the others being Joy and X-Men Apocalypse). After watching Pratt in his two previous films, Guardians Of The Galaxy and Jurassic World, I did find him a bit irritating, however, my opinion soon changed after watching his portrayal of Jim. This is probably his most dramatic role and also his best one, in my opinion. What I also loved about the film was the setting and design of the Avalon. When Jim and Aurora are exploring the ship, I was blown away by how stunning it all looked. The visual effects are amazing too. The scene where Jim and Aurora fly outside the ship is one of my favourite sequences in the film. Overall, I think this is a film that everyone needs to see as it's original and features elements of drama, romance, action and bits of comedy sprinkled in for good measure. It's also worth watching for the performances from both Lawrence and Pratt.

The second science fiction feature film to appear on this list, Arrival is, by far, the best film I've watched this year. It's smart, thought-provoking, has an original plot and features an outstanding performance from Amy Adams as the lead character. Before I watched this film in November, Arrival premiered at the Venice Film Festival where the director, Denis Villeneuve won the Future Film Festival Digital Award. It was then screened at the Toronto International Film Festival, Telluride Film Festival and the British Film Institute London Film Festival. Since then, it's gone on to receive widespread critical acclaim with a 94% rating on Rotten Tomatos with 268 reviews with many saying it's a 'must-see in cinemas' so, of course, with all the positive reviews surrounding this film, I had high expectations. Fortunately, Arrival proved to be better than what I expected it to be. At first, I thought it was about an alien invasion but, after watching it, I now know it's about more than that. Arrival begins with Louise Banks (Adams) experiencing a personal tragedy. Now, she's a professor at a university teaching language when they arrive. And by they, I mean large, mysterious objects that have appeared at numerous places across the globe. With Louise being an expert at linguistics, she is brought in by the military to try and communicate with the aliens that live inside the pods. Most alien invasion films focus on trying to destroy the extra-terrestrial beings before trying to find out what they want. However, in Arrival, the military make the decision to try and find out what the aliens want. Villeneuve succeeds in creating an tense atmosphere throughout the film. The most intense scenes occur when Louise first meets the aliens, which they soon call 'heptapods', and tries to communicate with them. Not only are these scenes really intense but this is where Arrival is at its most engaging. Adams portrays Louise as a strong, brave protagonist and she's one of the reasons why Arrival is successful. This is a cinematic masterpiece and the best film of 2016.

Those were 15 of my favourite films this year.
I do recommend that you give them a watch.
Thank you for reading my blogpost, I really do appreciate it. 
I can't wait to find out what my top ten films of  2017 will be.








No comments:

Post a Comment