Showing posts with label Directed by Christopher Nolan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Directed by Christopher Nolan. Show all posts

Wednesday, 26 August 2020

TENET REVIEW

 *MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS*

A lot of films, unfortunately, have had their release dates delayed due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Other films have been released through video on demand, which allows viewers to watch it at home without it having a theatrical release. It's been disappointing seeing all of these films be delayed. At the beginning of this year, I was most excited for the newest James Bond film, No Time To Die, and the sequel to A Quiet Place. Both were due to come out earlier this year, unfortunately, cinemas across the UK were forced to close at the end of March leading to the films having their release date pushed back, with No Time to Die due to be released in November this year and A Quiet Place Part II pushed back to next year. Another film I was excited for was Christopher Nolan's Tenet. This was because the premise sounded interesting and Nolan is one of my favourite directors. Tenet was supposed to be released in July, unfortunately, it was soon postponed indefinitely by the distribution company, Warner Bros, in June. When this announcement was made, I was devastated as I was really hoping to see it. However, at the end of July, things began to look up as cinemas reopened with new safety measures, such as the availability of hand sanitisers throughout the cinema and social distancing guidelines, put in place. I returned to the cinema and watched new films such as Proxima, Unhinged and Babyteeth. With cinemas reopened, Warner Bros. announced that Tenet would be released this year on August 26th. I couldn't be happier about this decision as I honestly didn't think that it would get released this year. With its release date approaching, I watched Tenet's trailer and my excitement increased. Following a mostly positive reception from critics, my expectations were high, however, is Tenet a film worth returning to the cinema for?
Armed with only one word, Tenet, and fighting for the survival of the entire world, a secret agent, known only as the Protagonist (John David Washington) journeys through a twilight world of international espionage on a mission that will unfold in something beyond real time.
In answer to my earlier question, yes, I think that Tenet is definitely a film worth returning to the cinema for. It features many of the things viewers have come to expect from Nolan's films, including exhilarating action sequences, strong performances delivered by its talented ensemble cast and a story that is either going to confuse you or excite you. While I understand that there's a lot of anxiety surrounding people over whether or not they should go to the cinema, especially because of the current pandemic, I think that, if you really want to go, you should. I've visited my local cinema frequently since they've reopened and I've been really impressed with the new health and safety measures they've put in. In my opinion, I think that cinemas are cleaner now than they were prior to the outbreak of COVID-19 because members of staff are cleaning it more often whereas last year, they only tidied the screens and they didn't clean them as regularly as they do now. What I'm trying to say is, if you want to watch Tenet at the cinema, then go, however, if you are too anxious about visiting the cinema, then don't feel bad about staying at home. Now, back to my review of Tenet.
I think that, the main reason why I enjoyed Tenet so much is because I'm a fan of Nolan's previous films, including Inception, The Dark Knight and Dunkirk. Because Tenet's narrative is complex, like Inception and Memento, a lot of it is going to be lost on the average viewer looking for a typical action film. That's also why I liked it so much as there are too many action films that are lazily made and focus more on special effects rather than character and story. Because Nolan focuses more on creating thought provoking and compelling films rather than telling unoriginal, predictable stories, that's why I think he's one of the greatest filmmakers working today. His passion for film is shown clearly in every feature he makes and that couldn't be more true of Tenet. Nolan took more than five years to write the screenplay after deliberating about Tenet's central ideas for over a decade. He made a conscious effort to abstain from any influence of the spy genre other than his own memory. While Tenet is often confusing at times, that doesn't prevent it from further establishing Nolan as one of the most creative and best visionary filmmakers working today.
One aspect Tenet excels in is its exhilarating action sequences which is where the film is at its most exciting. I've always been impressed with Nolan and his use of practical effects instead of relying on computer generated imagery. While CGI isn't necessarily a bad thing, practical effects are more impressive. As evident in the trailer, one of the highlights shows a plane crashing into a building. While other filmmakers would have, understandably, played it safe and used a model plane, Nolan used a real plane for the sequence. To create this sequence, the production team purchased and then crashed a real 747 into a hangar. The stunt was all practical with no CGI. Nolan had originally planned to use miniatures and set-piece builds, however, while scouting for locations in Victorville, California, the team discovered a massive array of old planes and it became apparent that it would actually be more efficient to buy a real plane of the real size and perform the sequence for real on camera. It's because of the exciting action sequences why Tenet is worth seeing on the big screen. 
Prior to viewing Tenet, I was worried I would find Tenet confusing. The first time I watched Inception, Interstellar and Memento, I will admit to being confused, however, following several re-watches, I thoroughly understand them now. I think that is, most likely, to be the case with Tenet. During my viewing, I was asking a few questions in my head, however, by the end, I understood the complex narrative. Now I know what happens, I think I'll enjoy Tenet more on my next watch.
Tenet's plot is simple as it follows a secret agent that is trying to prevent World War III, however, Nolan's execution is not. What is most interesting about Tenet is that not everyone who sees it will have the same opinion of it. It's definitely the most divisive film as some, like me, will love what Nolan has created and appreciate all the hard work that has gone into making an exciting and unique action film, however, there will be others who will leave the cinemas asking more questions and wondering what they've just watched. A lot of action films, that are predictable, fail to leave any lasting impression and will have been forgotten about by the time the viewer has left the cinema. That's not the case with Tenet as it's a film people will be talking about for years to come. It's been a decade since the release of Inception and people are still discussing its ambiguous ending. Chances are, most people aren't going to understand what's just happened in Tenet but that doesn't necessarily means it's a bad film, it's just a film that would benefit from repeated viewings, however, it's a struggle when people are unsure about visiting the cinema even once. 
A lot of Nolan's films, including Inception, The Dark Knight and Dunkirk are known for featuring an A-list cast of famous actors, however, while they've all delivered strong performances, I felt that Nolan's cast was getting a bit repetitive with Tom Hardy, Cillian Murphy, Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Michael Caine frequently appearing in his films. The cast consists of some of the most talented actors working today. Denzel Washington is a famous name within Hollywood, however, his son, John David, has successfully made a name for himself. Following his effective performance in Spike Lee's Oscar winning film, BlacKkKlansman, which targeted issues of racism, Washington continues to impress. He is everything a protagonist should be: smart, brave and likable. Unsurprisingly, because there are a lot of action sequences, there are a lot of fight scenes, however, instead of relying on stunt doubles, Washington performed them himself. While I understand why actors would use stunt doubles for their own safety, the action sequences and fight scenes were all the more impressive knowing it was actually Washington performing the stunts and not a professional and adds to Tenet's authenticity. Since appearing in the infamous Twilight franchise, Pattinson has appeared in many films to establish himself as a more serious actor and I think that he has mostly succeeded. In Tenet, he portrays Neil who is the Protagonist's handler. His performance here has made me even more excited for his take on the titular caped crusader in Matt Reeves' The Batman, which is due to be released at the end of next year. Elizabeth Debicki has delivered small but memorable supporting roles in films such as Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 and Widows, however, as Kat, she delivers one of her most impressive performances yet. Another actor I was impressed by was Kenneth Branagh who is known for portraying likable and charming characters, however, as Russian oligarch, Andrei Sator, he plays against type and is the antagonist to Washington's protagonist. Solid supporting roles are delivered by Caine, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Clémence Poésy, Himesh Patel and Dimple Kapadia.
Tenet marks the first film since The Prestige, which was released in 2006, not to be scored by Hans Zimmer, who composed the score for his dream project, Dune. He was replaced by newcomer Ludwig Göransson who recently won an Academy Award for his score for Black Panther. His score for Tenet is effective and adds to the dramatic tension that feature within the film. 
With Tenet, Christopher Nolan has created another exciting new film that is entirely worth visiting the cinema for. 
8/10

Saturday, 22 July 2017

DUNKIRK REVIEW

*MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS*
While Dunkirk is classed as a 'war film', its tone and style are similar to that of a high-octane thriller. This is director/writer Christopher Nolan's most serious film to date and, despite its July release date, will surely be remembered once the Academy Awards roll around next year. Last year, Mel Gibson released Hacksaw Ridge which was a war film based on a soldier who refused to kill or even hold a gun. It was a huge success and received four nominations and won two including Best Film Editing and Best Achievement in Sound Mixing. Because Dunkirk fully captures the horrors of World War II through Nolan's unique vision, I can't imagine it walking away empty handed at the Academy Awards next year.
World War II was fought primarily in three places, on land, in the air and at sea. Dunkirk takes a similar approach, choosing to tell three different stories from each of these distinct point of views. On the beach, we follow a young soldier, Tommy (Fionn Whitehead), as he struggles to survive and get home. In the air, a pilot, Farrier (Tom Hardy), focuses on shooting enemy planes down to try and stop them from bombing ships that are taking the soldiers home. At sea, a sailor, Mr. Dawson (Mark Rylance), takes his boat to try and pick up soldiers from Dunkirk. Meanwhile, Commander Bolton (Kenneth Branagh) is on the pier to make sure the soldiers are evacuated via the ships safely. This is all presented in a non-linear narrative which leads to an emotional conclusion.
I can't think of a better person to direct and write this other than Nolan. In the past, he has proven himself to be a master at both directing and writing with films such as Memento, Inception and The Dark Knight proving to be huge successes, both at the box office and with critics and audiences alike. His previous film, Interstellar, was a science-fiction masterpiece with stunning visual effects and an thought-provoking narrative at the centre. Of course, because of all this, there was a lot of pressure for Nolan to create a war film that's recreats WWII effectively. Fortunately, he has succeeded. I think that this is the best war film since Steven Spielberg's Saving Private Ryan. Unlike the aforementioned film, Dunkirk has very little gore. Most of the shock factor comes from the bomb explosions and the reactions from the soldier's faces. Seeing them struggling to survive is heartbreaking as we know not everyone survive. 
Nolan has said that the two films he studied before making Dunkirk were the 1953 drama, Wages of Fear, and the 1994 thriller, Speed. Having seen the latter film, I can see the similarities. Like Speed, Dunkirk is fast paced and involves the lives of innocent people being at risk. Despite the characters being underdeveloped, we still feel for them and want them to survive, especially Whitehead's Tommy, who is a 19 year old soldier who wants to get home but this doesn't stop him from helping others. Most directors would've chosen an older and more experienced actor for this role, however, Nolan chose Whitehead as he was the same age as the soldier he plays in the film. I think this was a good decision as he gives an impressive performance in his debut film. Tommy is brave and smart and someone we hope will make it back home. Alongside him, former member of boyband One Direction, Harry Styles gives a solid performance as Alex. When I first heard that Styles had been cast in this film, I was annoyed as I knew this would mean a lot of his fans, who are mainly young girls, will see it purely for him and will take the focus away from the film itself. His fans may be disappointed to learn that this isn't Styles' film, he is mainly one of thousands of soldiers that feature in this film.
Speaking of performances, apart from Whitehead, there's no stand-out. However, there's not a bad performance to be found. Dunkirk features a lot of well-known names including Harry Styles, Tom Hardy, Mark Rylance, Kenneth Branagh and Cillian Murphy to name a few. Hardy gives an understated performance as the pilot determined to shoot the enemy planes down. Rylance gives a great performance as Mr. Dawson as the sailor who, along with his two teenage sons, performs a selfless act by rescuing many soldiers who are stranded at sea. He soon picks up Murphy's character who is simply credited as 'Shivering Soldier'. Murphy is effective in this role as we can clearly see how much the war has had an impact on him and when he finds out that Mr. Dawson is heading towards Dunkirk, where he's just escaped from, he panics as he worries that they'll all die out there. Director Nolan knows how to get the best out of every actor and this clearly shows in Dunkirk. I don't think that there'll be any Best Actor nominations at the Academy Awards as there's no lead performance. 
I've seen a few comments criticising the lack of female characters that feature in Dunkirk. The only females seen in this film are nurses and this shouldn't be a criticsm because, at the time when this film took place in 1950, women were seen as mothers and nurses and nothing more than that. They would stay at home to look after the children and the majority of them didn't even have jobs. It's not bad writing as this is literally what society was like 77 years ago. 
Although I didn't see this in IMAX, it still had a major impact on me. The sound of the bomb explosions and gunfire were extremely loud and lead to many jump scares. A soldier could be walking down a street and, all of sudden, gun fire would start out of nowhere. The sound was incredibly effective as I felt like I was in the middle of the war and could feel the soldier's fear. Dunkirk is definitely not for the faint-hearted.
Nolan filmed this in its titular location in France. Other filmmakers would've shot in other locations to cut the costs but because Nolan didn't want to cut corners, he chose to film in the same location where the World War II events took place. In this sense, the film seems determined to be as historically accurate as possible and Nolan has succeeded.
What I liked most about Nolan's approach to this film is his lack of computer-generated imagery. While CGI isn't necessarily bad, it can look artificial at times. Nolan chose to use practical effects which meant that all the explosions that featured in the film actually happened which mean that the reactions on the actors' faces are genuine looks of horror. 
Hans Zimmer has frequently collaborated with Nolan and his scores for The Dark Knight, Inception and Interstellar are all stand-outs. His score for Dunkirk is just as intense and is constructed around the ticking of a clock, which happened to be Nolan's pocket watch. Zimmer proves once more why he's one of the greatest composers.
Nolan is known for releasing films that run at over two hours. However, Dunkirk is Nolan's shortest film since his debut, Following, in 1998. His 2002 thriller, Insomnia, was his last film to run at under two hours. Dunkirk has a runtime of 106 minutes. Nolan has said that he wanted the film to be as intense an experience as possible and therefore as lean and as stripped down and short an experience as possible. When it was announced that he would be directing a film based on WWII, a lot of people expected a big, historical epic that ran at three hours long. Nolan revealed that his screenplay was only 76 pages due to the small amount of dialogue in the film. He also said that he 'didn't want the theatrics of people telling the audience why you should care about them'. He also 'wanted them to care just because of the physical situation that they were under'. Fortunately, with that, Nolan has succeeded.
Dunkirk is an emotionally satisfying spectacle and is delivered by Christopher Nolan, a writer and director who is full command of his craft. It's also brought to life by an ensemble cast who all honour this fact-based story. It deserves to be seen on the biggest screen possible and is the kind of film that should be taught in history classes, to give the younger generation an idea of what the world was like over 70 years ago.
9/10

Saturday, 26 December 2015

INCEPTION REVIEW

*MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS*
Inception is, by far, director Christopher Nolan's best film and one of Leonardo DiCaprio's best roles.
DiCaprio plays Dominic Cobb who is a skilled thief and is an expert at stealing secrets from deep within the subconscious. He manages to achieve this whilst in the sleep state.
Most people would say that the narrative is too complicated to understand and I would agree. However, after a few watches, I managed to completely understand the purpose of the film which is to excite and create tension for the viewers and keep them engaged for over two hours. This film does need your 100% attention. If you leave the film, even for a minute, you'll have missed about 10% of the film. This film isn't for the faint-hearted. I would recommend this film to those who are fans of action and sci-fi and Nolan's previous films, such as Memento
The film has a strong opening. We see Dom in the middle of a heist and trying to steal a secret from within Saito's (Ken Watanabe) mind. However, Saito figures out Dom's plan and Dom fails. Both conscious, Saito offers Dom the chance to go home and see his children as he hasn't been back due to the fact his wife killed herself and framed him, making it look like he killed her. What Saito asks Dom to do isn't to steal an idea from a persons subconscious but to plant an idea instead. Dom agrees and now must face his most difficult challenge yet. He assembles a team of specialists that include: Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), the architect who manages and researches Dom's missions; Eames (Tom Hardy) who specialises in forgery and can create different characters inside a persons mind; Ariadne (Ellen Page), a young graduate student who designs the dreams and Yusuf (Dileep Rao) who provides the sedatives for the mission.
The majority of the film is spent planning out the mission but this isn't boring. This allows the viewer to understand how difficult their mission is and how it is achieved. This is also one of the most important scenes in the film as we learn how everything works and we get to know the characters more.
At the beginning of the film, when Dom fails his mission, we see his frustration at not succeeding which is one of the reasons why we want him to achieve this mission. We also want him to succeed for the sake of the children, who have been living without either of their parents and with their grandfather (Michael Caine).
As I mentioned earlier, this is an action film, however, the action sequences don't take place until the final hour of the film when Dom and his team are carrying out their plan.
This doesn't matter, though, as the action sequences are some of the best I've ever seen. Guns get shot and people get injured which puts Dom's mission at risk of failing. However, he doesn't give up and becomes even more determined to succeed.
This film also contains one of the best stunt sequences in the film and it's not achieved by Dom but by his partner, Arthur, during an anti-gravity scene. Gordon-Levitt, who plays Arthur, did all of his own stunts in this film which is really impressive and the reason why it's one of my favourite sequences in the film.
The film achieved a total of four Oscars, one of them for cinematography and one for its visual effects. I'm not surprised about this as the cinematography and visual effects are some of the best I've ever seen in cinema.
One of my only regrets about this film is that when I first saw it at the cinema, I was only thirteen at the time and wasn't interested in the film and didn't enjoy it until I watched it during my Film Studies class when I was 16.
Overall, with amazing directing and writing from Christopher Nolan, interesting characters, brilliant action sequences and stunning special effects, this is, by far, one of my favourite films.
9/10


Monday, 9 November 2015

THE DARK KNIGHT RISES REVIEW

*MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS*
If you're looking for a great way to conclude one of the biggest and best superhero franchises ever made, this is it.
Christian Bale returns as the iconic superhero, Batman, and he is at his weakest. Due to the events at the end of The Dark Knight, Wayne is injured and hasn't been able to be the vigilante he once was. For eight years, he's been living in his manor with his butler, Alfred (Michael Caine) caring for him.
Likewise with The Dark Knight, we are introduced to the villain, Bane (Tom Hardy), at the beginning of the film. And we first see him after a bag is taken over his head which is similar to The Dark Knight because we don't see the Joker's face until after he takes his mask off near the end of the opening sequence. I think this is a great way to introduce a villain. With the Joker, he has just robbed a bank. I didn't think that could be topped in this film but director Christopher Nolan manages to make another tense sequence by having Bane crashing a plan whilst kidnapping a doctor.
Whilst Hardy is brilliant as Bane, it would be unfair to compare it to Ledger's Joker so I'm not going to do that. Bane wears a mask over the majority of his face and is twice the size of Batman due to his huge body which makes him intimidating. His plan is to destroy Gotham City by creating a bomb.
When Bruce discovers Bane's plane, he soon recovers from his injury and re-learns his fighting skills from the first film, Batman Begins. However, his fighting skills are rubbish compared to Bane, whose fighting skills are brutal. In one fight sequence between the two, he manages to break Batman's back. This is really disturbing as, out of the whole trilogy, we've never seen Batman beaten, mentally and physically, like this. This makes us wonder: is the villain going to get away with his plan?
Of course, to fight off a villain like Bane, Batman needs a support system. Returning to help Bruce are: his loyal butler, Alfred; Lucius Fox (Morgan Freeman) and Lieutenant Jim Gordon (who has recently been promoted to Commissioner.
We are also introduced to some new characters in this film, one of them being Selina Kyle (Anne Hathaway) who is a cat burgular and femme fatale. She's flirtatious and mysterious and we never really know, for sure, who's side she's on until the conclusion of the film. Hathaway is one of my favourite actresses, and has been for a long time, so I loved watching her as Kyle. She was perfect for the role.
In The Dark Knight, Bruce didn't have a love interest but he does in this film and it's Miranda Tate (Marion Cotillard) who is a member of the Wayne Enterprises executive board and encourages Bruce to rejoin society and continue his father's philanthropic works.
As always, there are plenty of action sequences, especially in the finale. The way Nolan created this scene was incredible and it's what I loved most about this film.
I'm sad to see one of the greatest superhero franchises come to an end but I'm happy that Nolan managed to create a film that was just as good as it's previous predecessors.
8/10
Read my review of Batman Begins here
Read my review of The Dark Knight here

BATMAN BEGINS REVIEW

*MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS*
Batman Begins is the first of three films about the iconic comic-book superhero, Batman. This film is about how Batman first came to be the famous vigilante he is now. We don't even see Batman until exactly one hour into the film but that's okay. The first scenes of Bruce Wayne training with Ra's Al Ghul, in the organization known as the League of Shadows, are brilliant and full of suspense. Wayne soon leaves and returns to his home town of Gotham where he plans to stop crime and become a vigilante. However, he is the son of Thomas Wayne, a famous philanthropist who owns Wayne Enterprises and is known by the whole of Gotham. Unfortunately, Thomas and his wife, Martha, were shot when Bruce was just a child so he was brought up by their loyal and caring butler, Alfred (Michael Caine). Now, an adult, it's up to Wayne himself to take care of the business his father built but, whilst he's out training in the League of Shadows, he is presumed dead and the enterprise is taken over by Willam Earle. Fortunately, Wayne arrives and takes back his enterprise. This isn't his main concerrn, however. Since leaving the League of Shadows, Wayne has wanted to become a anonymous vigilante so no one will know it's him. This is where Batman comes in. We learn that, as a child, Wayne had a fear of bats. Now an adult, he conquers his fears and bases his superhero identity on the winged creatures. 
Like I mentioned earlier, we don't meet Batman until one hour into the film but, when we do, it's an iconic scene where he lifts a drug lord out of a car and snarls "I'm Batman!" Definitely one of the best scenes in the entire trilogy. 
Director Christopher Nolan has finally made a Batman film we can all watch without cringing and one that he should be proud of. It's mature and dark much like the caped crusader himself. 
Christian Bale is the perfect choice for Bruce Wayne/Batman. He really brings the emotion to the character and makes Batman his own. I can't imagine anyone doing a better job than him.
And with every superhero film, there's a villain. In this, it's psychiatrist, Dr Jonathan Crane (Cillian Murphy) who mentally scars his patients by using a toxin gas and wearing a mask that resembles a scarecrow, hence his name The Scarecrow. I think he is definitely one of the scariest villains out of the whole trilogy because of the mental images he shows. 
Helping Batman to fight the injustice in Gotham is Alfred, who is like a father to Bruce and has cared for him since he was a child. He's always there to protect Bruce and to assisst him in any way possible. 
Morgan Freeman appears as a 'Q-like' character, Lucius Fox, who works at Wayne Enterprises and is there to equip Wayne with any gadgets he might need (such as the iconic Batmobile).
Gary Oldman is best known for portraying over-the-top characters but now he has started playing more mature roles. In this, he protrays Sergeant Jim Gordon who cared for Bruce briefly when his parents were shot. Now, many years later, he is still a detective and is unsure of who Batman is or what he plans to do but, by the end, he becomes one of Batman's loyal allies.
And, with most films, the superhero has a love interest. In this, it's Rachel Dawes (Katie Holmes), who has been friends with Bruce since they were children. However, by the end of the film, Bruce develops feelings for her but she doesn't want to start a relationship with him because of Batman, much to Bruce's dismay.
Overall, a great start to the Batman trilogy. 
8/10
Read my review of The Dark Knight here
Read my review of The Dark Knight Rises here

THE DARK KNIGHT REVIEW

*MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS*
If you're looking for an mature, action-packed superhero movie look no further than The Dark Knight. This is, by far, one of the best superhero films ever made. 
Some of the superhero films, that I've seen, are pretty average. They have a predictable plot: there's a superhero and a villain. The villain has an evil plan and the superhero has to stop the villain. The superhero stops the villain and saves the day. There was no suspense and hardly any gripping action.
This isn't the case with The Dark Knight
Throughout the 1990s, there were two film adaptations of the iconic superhero but they were all camp and cheesy. Back then, the only good adaptation of Batman was the 1989 film starring Michael Keaton as the Dark Knight and he was really good. 
However, when it was announced that Christopher Nolan was going to be directing a new Batman film back in 2005, no one expected it to be the mature, action-packed thriller that it was. Christian Bale surprised audiences with his performance of Batman and showed everyone that he was perfect for the role. No one had seen a Batman film made like this before so when the sequel, The Dark Knight, was released in 2008, people had high expectations. Did it meet those expectations? Yes. In fact, it was better than what people expected it to be.
Now, comes the much-anticipated sequel with Christian Bale returning as the title character, the Dark Knight.
The opening to this film is brilliant and is probably the best opening sequence I've ever seen. We are introduced to the film's main villain, the Joker (Heath Ledger). We first see him start a bank heist with several clown-masked people and killing them off one by one so that the Joker would be left with all of the money. I think the reason why this was the best opening sequence was because of the way we were introduced to the Joker. We've seen him rob a bank but, before he leaves, we see a close up of him taking off the mask and we finally see his terrifying make-up. He also says one of my favourite lines of the movie: "I believe whatever doesn't kill you simply makes you stranger". Within five minutes, we finally learn what a pyschopath the Joker really is. In the first Batman film in 1989, he was played by Jack Nicholson and he made a good Joker but he wasn't terrifying like Ledger's portrayal in this. Ledger truly deserved his posthumous Oscar for 'Best Supporting Actor'. The Joker is one of the best villains because he's so unpredictable. You never know what's he going to do next.
Returning to help Batman defeat the Joker is: Bruce Wayne's loyal butler Alfred (Michael Caine); Sergeant Jim Gordon (Gary Oldman), who has recently been promoted to Lieutenant; Lucius Fox (Morgan Freeman), who provides Batman with all the gadgets and new District Attorney, Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhart).
In the first film, Bruce's love interest was Rachel Dawes, who didn't start a relationship with him because of Batman. Now, she's in a relationship with Harvey Dent. Also, in the first film, she was portrayed by Katie Holmes but, due to scheduling conflicts, she's replaced by Maggie Gyllenhaal who, I think, is a better choice. She brings more emotion to the role and we care for her more.
Despite having a good support team around him, Batman is finding it difficult to stop the Joker because he wants Batman to reveal his true identity or he will begin killing people. This is Batman's biggest dilemma, he doesn't want to reveal his true identity because it will ruin Wayne's reputation as a wealthy businessman but he doesn't want anyone to die. Does he turn himself in or will he find a way to stop the Joker?
The film also contains one of my favourite quotes in the film, said by Dent whilst he's at a dinner with Bruce and Rachel: "You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain". The reason why this is one of my favourite quotes is because it foreshadows Dent's future. He is seen as Gotham's White Knight (compared to Batman's Dark Knight) so he could've died a hero but, unfortunately, the latter of the quote becomes true, thanks to the Joker's manipulation.
What I also love about this film, is that it's not heavy on CGI unlike The Avengers. All the action sequences was done with clever planning and great cinematography which makes them look realistic.
When The Dark Knight was first released in 2008, it broke box office records, making over $533m. That was the highest a superhero film had ever made at the time and I'm not surprised.
This isn't only the best superhero films I've ever seen, it's also one of the best action films I've ever seen, if not the best.
9/10
Read my review of Batman Begins here
Read my review of The Dark Knight Rises here